The Year Workplace Design Grew Up

Looking back, 2025 was not a year of dramatic reinvention for CRE design in Asia Pacific. It was the year the sector became clearer, even calmer about what the office is really for.

After several turbulent years of experimentation, debate and reactive change, it appears many organisations stopped chasing the next workplace idea and started designing with intent. Research from CBRE’s 2025 Asia Pacific Office Occupier Survey reflected this shift clearly. Across the region, it was evident occupiers were actively supporting a return to office, not as a blanket mandate, but as a way to strengthen culture, collaboration and leadership visibility. The office was no longer expected to support every task equally. It was designed to support the work that genuinely benefits from being together.

This clarity reshaped design priorities. Desk counts continued to fall, but shared spaces became more purposeful. Collaboration areas, client-facing environments and social spaces were planned meticulously, with a stronger understanding of how people actually use them. The office re-established itself as a place for momentum, decision-making and connection, rather than default attendance.

Another lesson from 2025 was the growing maturity around workplace experience. JLL’s Asia Pacific research consistently pointed to a flight to quality, with occupiers prioritising better buildings and better-designed space, even as cost pressures remained. Experience was no longer treated as a layer added at the end of a project. It became part of the commercial logic. In competitive talent markets such as Singapore, India and parts of Southeast Asia, the workplace increasingly functioned as talent infrastructure, not just real estate.

This was reinforced by sharper thinking on space efficiency. High rents and limited supply forced discipline. Many organisations reduced their footprint or held it steady, but invested more per square metre. Colliers’ Asia Pacific office market insights showed demand continuing to concentrate in prime Grade A space, underlining that quality, not quantity, was the differentiator. Design teams were expected to justify every area, with multi-use spaces replacing underutilised single-function rooms and data increasingly informing planning decisions.

Wellbeing also matured. By 2025, it was less about visible gestures and more about fundamentals. Natural light, acoustics, thermal comfort and air quality became central to design briefs. This aligns closely with findings in JLL’s APAC Fit-Out Cost Guide 2025, which highlighted rising demand for sustainable and employee-centric fit-outs. In Asia Pacific, wellbeing was judged by how reliably a space supported daily work, not how well it photographed. Biophilic design remained relevant, but it was often quieter and more integrated.

Technology followed a similar path. The emphasis shifted from novelty to reliability. Seamless booking systems, dependable hybrid meeting environments and intuitive user experiences became baseline expectations. AI entered the CRE conversation more through planning, utilisation analysis and portfolio optimisation than through visible spatial change. When technology worked well, it largely disappeared into the background.

Sustainability continued to influence design decisions, but with a stronger focus on execution. Regulation, investor pressure and global corporate commitments pushed ESG higher up the agenda, particularly in Singapore and Australia. Across Southeast Asia, multinational occupiers often led adoption, adapting global sustainability frameworks to local realities. Retrofit and adaptive reuse gained further momentum as practical responses to both carbon targets and market constraints.

Perhaps the clearest sign that CRE design grew up in 2025 was the renewed respect for local context. Global workplace models still did not translate cleanly across Asia Pacific. Cultural expectations continued to shape how space was used and valued. Japanese offices leaned into structure and clarity. Southeast Asian workplaces prioritised warmth and social energy. And Australian offices generally remained informal but increasingly design-led. The most successful projects reflected local working styles while aligning with broader organisational strategy.

As we look ahead to 2026, the lesson from 2025 appears to be quite straightforward. Corporate Real Estate design in APAC is becoming less performative and more purposeful. So less about trends and more about outcomes. The offices that will succeed are not the most experimental, but the most intentional. Those that understand why people come in, what they need when they do, and how space can quietly support better work.

References